Please observe: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender id.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are consistently beneath fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on all the things from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial range. The form of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers individuals to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and nil accountability. If that appears like a struggle on girls, properly… you’re not improper.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to combat again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t should find out about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Information is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA have been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is important to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has lately modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of important public well being data on subjects corresponding to HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable choices about therapy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply limit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Happily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it obtainable to the general public5. This text comprises an inventory of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one get together to a different mustn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Position of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Girls’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being by way of coverage, schooling, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a essential step in making certain that illnesses, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by way of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more essential.
Trusted, Proof-Primarily based Girls’s Well being Assets
Under is a curated record of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of ladies of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By looking for out and sharing these sources, we are able to collectively safeguard entry to important well being data and be sure that all girls have the data they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Mission
Trains and helps main care clinicians to develop entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Gives free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Levels:
The American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an energetic position of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality providers and is the most important supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Gives rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Girls
Targeted on girls aged 35 to 64, this group supplies medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome ageing and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Normal Hospital Middle for Girls’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Data Middle
Gives reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life levels, with specialised help for BIPOC people looking for culturally aligned care.
Middle for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by way of vitamin, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply necessary—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that help knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the arduous work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value preventing for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says
