Radio Atlantic: Within the Oval Workplace With Donald Trump

Subscribe right here: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Overcast | Pocket Casts

Why would President Donald Trump invite The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, whom Trump has attacked as a “complete sleazebag,” to satisfy with him within the Oval Workplace? Donald Trump himself requested the query when Goldberg and two Atlantic reporters got here to the Oval Workplace final week to satisfy him: “Most individuals would say, Why are you doing that?” he mused. The technical reply is that this journal’s two White Home reporters, Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer, had requested an interview, and after many rejections, Trump lastly stated sure, and requested Goldberg to hitch.

However the most effective reply comes from Parker and Scherer, who talked with dozens of individuals over the previous few weeks about what’s animating Trump as of late: “From the primary cellphone name, from the primary proposal we despatched to his workers, the primary conversations we had, this has been for him a negotiation,” says Sherer. “What are they making an attempt to do? Might I profit from it? Is it going to harm me? It’s a window into probably the most important truth of Donald Trump, which is that every part he engages in is a transaction, and he is fairly good at determining the place his benefit is. On the finish, he determined that it was to his benefit not solely to have us in, however to announce it to the world.”

On this episode of Radio Atlantic, we discuss with Goldberg about what Trump advised him about Signalgate. We additionally discuss to Parker and Sherer concerning the classes Trump discovered from his time within the political wilderness, and the way he’s making use of them in his second time period.

The next is a transcript of the episode:

[Music]

Rosin: That is The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, speaking about Donald Trump, after all.

[Music]

Rosin: That is Radio Atlantic. I’m Hanna Rosin.

Not lengthy earlier than Jeff and Atlantic workers writers Michael Scherer and Ashley Parker met within the Oval Workplace on Thursday, Trump posted on Fact Social, calling Jeff an individual, quote, “chargeable for many fictional tales about me.”

However Trump additionally wrote that Jeff’s newest story, Signalgate—about when Jeff was by accident added to a bunch chat about warfare plans (oops)—was considerably profitable. Trump wrote the phrase profitable in quotes.

Within the second half of the present, we’re going to discuss to Michael and Ashley about their cowl story in The Atlantic—“Trump Is Having fun with This”—together with about how Michael cold-called Trump, and Trump picked up the cellphone.

However first, I wished to know what occurred when Jeff—who wrote one of many greatest tales of this yr about Trump’s administration—met Trump, the man who referred to as him a “sleazebag.”

[Music]

Goldberg: We go over to the Resolute desk, and he stands up and—I overlook the precise phrases, however—it’s like, Oh, that is going to be fascinating. And he shakes arms with Ashley Parker, Michael Scherer, and offers me a giant handshake—huge, heat handshake. And we simply form of sit down proper in entrance of him—Steven Cheung is sitting on the identical row—and type of launch into it. I thanked him for seeing us, and I made my honest level that it’s higher for us to speak than not discuss. After which it was off to the races.

However he was charming, targeted. And primarily, I used to be there with two writers who have been truly writing a really massive piece for us, in order that they needed to drive the interview. However there was no hostility. I imply, you’ve learn the Fact Social submit about our go to that he posted, like, 4 hours earlier than that was stuffed with hostility and nonsense. And I stated to him—or certainly one of us stated—What was that about? He’s being Mr. Pleasant, Mr. Charmer. And he stated, Effectively, wished to up the stress on you slightly bit. After which he stated, All the pieces is a transaction. So it’s like, Look. I bought one thing out of that submit—that means, I bought to screw with you slightly bit—however you’ll promote so many extra magazines due to that submit.

Rosin: (Laughs.) Proper, proper, proper.

Goldberg: I can’t disagree with him. And it clearly drew—I imply, inside 20 minutes of that submit, I in all probability had, I don’t know, 50, 60, 70 media calls from different locations and, , reporters asking, Are you going to the White Home? After which there are tales simply concerning the mere undeniable fact that I used to be going over the White Home to see him.

So he’s proper. It does generate—he is aware of how to attract consideration.

Rosin: Proper. So clearly, you talked about Signalgate. Are you able to describe the change?

Goldberg: Yeah, It was very low-key. He wrote one thing that was odd in his Fact Social submit. He stated my scoop or, —he used loads of scare quotes—was “considerably extra ‘profitable’” than the “suckers and losers” story from 4 years in the past, 5 years in the past.

Rosin: He stated you have been considerably profitable with Signalgate.

Goldberg: Yeah. And so I stated, What does that imply? Do you imply that I uncovered an operational-security lapse that then helped you run a tighter administration? However what he meant was, like, You bought loads of consideration. The metric of success was, You bought extra consideration in that interval than I bought. I feel it was type of a, Effectively, all proper. You received that spherical. And so now you’ve bought to come back right here, and we’ve bought to speak about it.

It was not about something having to do with the problems at hand, whether or not it’s the warfare in Yemen or using private-message apps to ship labeled info or the competence of Mike Waltz, his national-security adviser, the competence of Pete Hegseth, his secretary of protection. It was nearly, Effectively, it was type of such as you received that spherical since you bought loads of consideration, and also you drove the agenda. I imply, to be truthful, I stated, What did you study on a coverage stage from this? And he stated, “Perhaps don’t use Sign.”

Rosin: However even that appeared slightly jokey. The change is fascinating. It’s, like, enjoyable to speak about. His reply is an effective punch line. However I’m questioning how critically to take the truth that he didn’t interact with the concept there was a severe safety breach that you just uncovered.

Goldberg: Every other president I’ve ever talked to—George W. Bush, Invoice Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, no matter—if the identical factor had occurred: To begin with, congressional investigations, [inspector general] investigations, felony probes. The president can be grave about it. And he would say, undoubtedly, Look—I can’t discuss it, as a result of it’s beneath a number of investigations, however what I can say is that I promise that it’ll by no means occur once more. However I can’t discuss it anymore, as a result of probably indictments are coming. Right here it’s like, Effectively, you received!

Rosin: Proper. LOL. Don’t use Sign.

Goldberg: Yeah, yeah, yeah. It’s all concerning the—yeah, it’s wild how totally different it’s in strategy.

Rosin: Yeah.

Goldberg: It’s only a recreation.

Rosin: Yeah. Which is what? What’s the adjective?

Goldberg: Dangerous.

Rosin: Dangerous. Okay. Did he say something about Pete Hegseth? Did you get the sense he was in bother in any means?

Goldberg: I feel Pete Hegseth is in bother from different reporting that we’ve achieved and different folks have achieved. He type of indicated that, Oh, I really like Pete. We had a chat. It’s a optimistic discuss. We had a chat, and he’s going to get it collectively. And, , he was behind him till he’s not behind him. When you discover out tomorrow that he’s out of the job, I imply, nobody’s going to be very shocked. Identical factor, true for Mike Waltz, for various causes.

I feel President Trump likes Pete Hegseth. True believer—true believer in Trump: Fox & Pals, loyalist, is aware of him from tv. But when that story of Pentagon mismanagement and incompetence continues, it will get in the way in which of different messages that the White Home is making an attempt to ship.

Rosin: Yeah. Was there something that he stated that can preserve you vigilant, the place you left pondering, Oh, now we have to maintain our eye on this one?

Goldberg: Yeah. When Ashley requested him concerning the 2028 hats and what they could imply, he largely made a joke of it and stated it wasn’t very doubtless and acknowledged that he’s a shatterer of norms, however type of indicated that could be a norm too far.

However he didn’t simply say, No. After all, I’m not making an attempt to run in 2028. The Structure doesn’t—a traditional politician in his second time period as president would say, Why are you asking me whether or not I’d run for a 3rd time period? I can’t. However that is Donald Trump, so every part’s open. And why wouldn’t it be shocking if he in some way tries to carry onto energy?

Rosin: Yeah.

Goldberg: So I’ve an eye fixed on that. I’m most keen on his insurance policies on Ukraine. And I requested him—I stated, Is there something that Vladimir Putin might do that may trigger you to type of totally and admittedly embrace Zelensky’s trigger? And he says, Zelensky? No. However Ukraine, he—

Rosin: He made it private.

Goldberg: He all the time makes it private. However he left it open the concept perhaps Putin can push him too far, which I assumed was fascinating. I don’t essentially imagine that. I feel he desires to be mates with Putin. And I feel he doesn’t care about Ukraine. However I additionally think about that he understands that photos of Russian tanks rolling into Kyiv and slaughtering Ukrainians can be dangerous for him.

Rosin: So did your impression of him, in an general means, change after this assembly? Like, in any means did you come away pondering otherwise, broadly about Trump than earlier than the assembly?

Goldberg: Look—I discover him completely fascinating, clearly. And for those who actually wish to know, I discover it very straightforward to narrate to his character, as a result of I grew up round folks like that. I grew up 5 miles from the place he grew up. I perceive that sort. I perceive the humor. Some folks don’t discover him humorous. I truly do discover him humorous. I do know that he’s doing shtick half the time. The shtick has extraordinary penalties, however his potential to bifurcate and never take something—how do I say this?

When you referred to as me the names that Donald Trump has referred to as me, I feel you and I’d each discover a private encounter very, very, very awkward. He doesn’t discover it awkward, as a result of he believes that it’s only a recreation. It’s only a efficiency. And I feel he believes—at the very least with me, and perhaps with others—that I imagine it’s only a efficiency. However no—he’s an fascinating man to speak to and take heed to. And our job is—to the extent that he’s comprehensible—to grasp him. And so the extra publicity I’ve to him, the higher it’s for me from an analytical standpoint. I’m making an attempt to determine what’s inside him, if there may be something inside him, and why he thinks the way in which he thinks.

[Music]

Rosin: Jeff, thanks for approaching.

Goldberg: Thanks for having me.

[Music]

Rosin: Once we come again:

Rosin: Atlantic workers writers Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer on their new cowl story: “Trump Is Having fun with This.”

Rosin: That’s after the break.

[Break]

Rosin: All proper, we’re again, and now I’m joined by workers writers Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer. Ashley, Michael, welcome to the present.

Ashley Parker: Thanks for having me.

Scherer: Thanks for having me.

Rosin: So let’s begin with the place it begins, which is the cellphone name.

Parker: Effectively, it truly begins with the request for the interview and him canceling it on Fact Social.

Scherer: So the story is that we talked to a few of his advisers. His advisers say, Sure, this feels like an incredible concept. We should always preserve speaking. We’ll get a request to the president. We type of write a proper request after some extra conversations; it’s delivered to the president. The president comes again and says to a staffer—tells Ashley, Sure, we’re doing it. We are able to in all probability have a photograph. We’d get a tour of the residence. We perhaps go to the Lincoln Bed room. After which we wait a couple of weeks, and it’s placed on the schedule provisionally. It’s form of mentioned in a bigger assembly on the White Home.

After which that afternoon, after it’s mentioned within the White Home, Ashley will get a name, form of final minute, saying, He’s about to place out a Fact Social. Brace yourselves. After which, , we have a look at our telephones, and he’s calling us names and saying, , he’s not going to take a seat down with us, he can’t belief us, etcetera, etcetera, which then prompts us to hunt different technique of getting his consideration.

Rosin: Okay, why don’t we simply play the cellphone name?

Rosin: I imply, so the way in which you land an interview with a sitting president is you simply name him on his cellphone, and he picks up the cellphone, “I do know who you’re, Michael.”

Scherer: You realize what’s fascinating about this? He didn’t say who he was. He didn’t actually make a lot sound initially, so I assumed it was a staffer selecting up the cellphone on his behalf, which is why I used to be so confused initially. And I needed to watch for, , a tone of his voice come by earlier than I noticed.

However sure, that’s beneath this present president the way in which issues work. I imply, we write about within the story that, , a number of folks have that cellphone quantity, and he talks with a number of folks, and he’s very happy with the folks he talks to privately. And the White Home doesn’t management this. The White Home had no concept we have been calling that day. You realize, he was not prepped for it.

You realize, one of many staffers stated that throughout the name, there was someone else within the room, they usually bought a textual content saying, Oh, by the way in which, it is best to know he’s on the cellphone proper now with a reporter. And they also form of discover out as we’re doing the dialog.

Parker: I ought to say, once more, it’s value noting: We did attempt to undergo official channels first, and it was solely as soon as it regarded like we weren’t going to get in that means that we procured the quantity and Michael referred to as him at 10:45 on a Saturday morning.

Rosin: I imply, that is so significantly better.

[Laughter]

Rosin: So that you’re simply sitting in your kitchen speaking to the president?

Scherer: No, I’ve, like, slightly workplace—like, a COVID workplace upstairs at my home. I needed to inform my youngsters to be quiet and inform my spouse to be quiet. It was a Saturday morning.

Rosin: So that you talked to lots of people moreover Trump about his comeback, and I’m most keen on classes he discovered from that comeback and dropped at his second time period. So, Ashley, you write that whereas he was within the political wilderness, which is after he misplaced the 2020 election, one huge lesson he discovered was the “vampire” lesson. Are you able to clarify that?

Parker: Sure. In that cellphone name, Michael requested him about it. However it was fascinating. It was that each one these would-be vampire slayers, the Democrats, the By no means Trumpers, the authorized instances towards him, the media critics, even his Republican opponents—they didn’t drive a stake by his coronary heart, persevering with with the vampire analogy.

And in doing so, they solely made him stronger. As an example, after January 6, when the Home impeaches him, , senators had a second the place they may have convicted him. That might’ve been a knockout blow. They didn’t. He was form of banished. There was a world through which Republicans might have labored to really implement that banishment.

I imply, as we went again and we reported this story, we knew there was this second the place Kevin McCarthy was in Florida for fundraisers. Trump invitations him to Mar-a-Lago. A photograph of the 2 of them is, , type of blasted out on social media, and it’s step one of Trump’s political retribution.

However what was so putting after we re-reported this, since you overlook a few of these particulars: That occurred one week after Trump left Washington as a pariah due to his position in January 6. It wasn’t three months later or a yr later: One week. After McCarthy himself advised perhaps Trump ought to resign and never even serve out the ultimate, , two weeks of his time period, he’s down there with a publicity picture that helps rehabilitate Trump. So it’s putting how shortly this all begins.

Rosin: So the lesson is—is it simply, like, no matter doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger?

Parker: The lesson is that—Michael can share his personal lesson; he thinks I say this too steadily, however my huge takeaway, with Michael writing 12,000 phrases and speaking to dozens of advisers, is that—Trump has a capability to bend actuality to his will and, by by no means ceding, by no means giving any quarter, to make folks imagine and really feel a model of occasions that doesn’t truly comport with actuality or the info on the bottom.

Rosin: Proper. Okay, in order that’s the lesson. Then how are we seeing that lesson play out on this new presidency?

Scherer: Effectively, I feel having overcome what he overcame over the 4 years within the wilderness has emboldened him. I imply, the angle with which he took again the White Home is so totally different from the angle with which he arrived in 2017, after the primary win. I keep in mind interviewing him in December of 2016, and there was a transparent sense—he was making an attempt to determine the best way to go ahead, however—he was nonetheless form of in shell shock.

He didn’t know who he was going to rent. He didn’t actually know the best way to run the federal government. He didn’t know a lot about governing or coverage or political idea. After which he type of stumbled round for years, making an attempt to determine that out. And his personal get together didn’t actually like him, loads of leaders. He comes by this course of, utilizing these 4 years, preventing his means again, taking up, lastly, the Republican Celebration, taking up, lastly, the Congress—I imply, he’s had a hand in nearly each certainly one of their campaigns at this level; I imply, he endorses, he talks to them—and really understanding how the federal authorities works and the way he wished to do it otherwise.

I imply, he talked about on the finish of the marketing campaign nearly this, , divine intervention with the assassination try. He appears like he’s prepared for this second and is available in, , with none reservations.

Parker: He additionally understands the norms that he can shatter, proper? That loads of the pillars of our democracy are form of based mostly on societal agreements and niceties that, when a court docket guidelines, you observe the court docket’s ruling. And within the first time period, there have been issues that Trump wished to do—hearth his lawyer basic—that the folks round him stated, You’ll be able to’t probably try this, proper? You’ll pay a political value, or, That’s towards the legislation, or, You completely can’t.

And this time, not solely is there nobody telling him he can’t; he totally believes he can. And this, , might not appear as consequential as, say, deporting folks with out due course of, however this time, when he says, You realize what? I type of wish to simply hearth everybody on the board of the Kennedy Middle and make myself chairman, as a substitute of aides being like, Effectively, you may’t probably try this, as a result of folks on the board serve six-year phrases, , they are saying, Okay. Sure, sir. We’re going to determine the best way to do it, and we’ll have you ever a solution by tomorrow. And he does it.

Rosin: Michael, he stated one thing in your cellphone name with him that pertains to that time. I wish to play it for us.

Rosin: What do you make of that? What’s he saying?

Scherer: He’s saying that his first time period and the 4 years earlier than he got here again to workplace have been consumed by him enjoying protection, by him being attacked by his rivals—he thinks, unfairly—and that he now feels freed from that, and he can lastly do the job he desires to do and form of be the president he all the time wished to be. Once we spoke to him within the Oval Workplace, he stated, After I fired James Comey, the FBI director when he first got here within the first time period, it was like throwing a rock right into a hornet’s nest.

And his level was, like, That was a shock. I didn’t notice what I used to be going to unleash. He comes into workplace now—he is aware of all of the threats that face him, so he goes after the legislation companies and says, When you’re going to do professional bono work on my facet, you’re not going to have the ability to work towards me. He goes into the FBI, places a handpicked man who has, like, written a youngsters’s ebook about him.

Rosin: Mm-hmm.

Scherer: I imply, is so devoted that there’s no query there. He begins declaring publicly that I’m the chief legislation enforcement officer of the nation, though that’s the title of the lawyer basic.

It’s nonetheless on the webpage of the Division of Justice: Chief legislation enforcement officer is the lawyer basic. He says, No, that’s me. And everybody is aware of it. And, , he’s been coming after media organizations very aggressively. They have been his opposition earlier than. He’s making an attempt to undercut them from the beginning.

And in order that’s simply all information he lacked in 2017 and 2018. And he’s coming in now and form of retaining everyone on protection from the beginning.

Rosin: You realize, one other huge distinction from his first time period that you just did ask him about on that cellphone name was his temper.

Scherer: That really got here out of interviews we had achieved with advisers to him earlier than, who had been saying that—that is within the first months of the administration. Folks would say to us, You’ll be able to’t imagine how a lot enjoyable we’re having. There’s no dangerous days right here. It’s simply nice.

Rosin: Sunshine on a regular basis.

Scherer: Sunshine on a regular basis. And the way a lot enjoyable he’s having.

They usually talked about—I imply, he nonetheless does this. He may have the press in for greater than an hour a day, routinely. You realize, three occasions, 35 minutes of questions, two instances, one other spray elsewhere. And he simply sits within the Oval Workplace and takes questions—and never even when information is going on—’til everybody’s drained. And he does it day by day as a result of he’s actually having fun with it.

Parker: They usually’ve additionally stated, even on days after they temporary him earlier than the press is available in, proper—even on days the place there’s going to be powerful points and difficult questions, —his angle is: It was described to us as form of like, Deliver within the hounds, proper? Like, it’s a enjoyable factor.

Rosin: And what distinction does that make, that he’s having enjoyable? Like, what does that carry the nation, the truth that he’s having enjoyable?

Scherer: I feel there’s much more—I don’t know if that is the precise phrase—like, adventurism. Like, the diploma to which he’s going—like, each week now, his advisers should give you new govt orders for him to signal, new issues for him to go after, new crusades to start out. You realize, what he did with tariffs was principally say to the world, You all have to barter with me. There’s a[n] urge for food right here that’s monumental. And he’s proper when he talks about, You must notice what number of issues I’ve bought within the combine proper now.

Once we spoke to him within the Oval Workplace, later that day, he directs the Justice Division to go after the chief fundraising equipment behind the Democratic Celebration, ActBlue. I imply, so I feel that’s actually what it means.

There’s a relentless urge for food for increasingly more and extra, which is admittedly in distinction to Biden, positively, , who was—on the finish of his time period, the aperture had been narrowed so small that what he was truly doing was very managed and really tight. And I don’t know if we’ve had as energetic a president.

Parker: And one other factor a prime Trump adviser advised us was that, , a number of the folks round him have a rule, which is that We solely do stuff when he says it twice. And we stated, Why? And, , this individual stated, Effectively, he says loads of loopy shit. However the distinction is: Earlier than, when he would say the quote-unquote “loopy shit” within the first time period, there have been individuals who would slow-walk it or, once more, inform him he couldn’t try this, or, , actually steal a paper off of his desk, with the hopes that he would overlook about it.

And now, you may have individuals who, yeah, perhaps they wish to hear it a second time, however when Trump comes up with some outlandish concept and he says it twice, they’re like, All proper, Mr. President. Let’s work out the best way to execute.

Rosin: Like Greenland, Gulf of America, no matter it’s. You realize what picture simply popped in my head as you each have been speaking? The film Huge. Whenever you preserve bringing the grown-up new toys, it’s like, The basketball factor isn’t sufficient. This isn’t sufficient. We have to do one thing else. You realize? Preserve them entertained.

One other factor that your sources talked to you about was the “shock-and-awe” technique. Are you able to describe what that’s and the way it’s performed out within the second time period?

Parker: Yeah, I consider {that a} ton, as properly. You realize, it’s not simply that Trump is form of this—to make use of the cliché—hearth hose of stuff in all places, as a result of he’s, , as they might say, “having enjoyable.” However it’s very deliberate. It’s very strategic.

And only one instance is a quote an adviser stated to us, however that type of sticks with me and might be utilized all through the administration up to now—though this pertained to day one. They stated, Look—on day one we, we deliberate for it, and we got here in, and we did all of those immigration govt orders. And if we had simply left it at that, the media would’ve coated it as, We’re horrible folks. We’re kicking immigrants in a foreign country. We’re separating, , ladies and kids. We’re terrible. However we did that, after which—bam!—we pardoned each one of many J-6ers.

And by the way in which, he provides his conventional inauguration remarks. He provides one other inauguration speech, then he repairs to the Oval Workplace, the place he takes questions from reporters within the Oval Workplace. After which that evening, he goes out dressed up, , together with his spouse and her designer garments to the balls. And it’s like, Screw you, media. You must select what you wish to cowl. You’ll be able to’t cowl all of it. And that’s to not point out the issues that they could be doing quietly behind the scenes that they actually don’t need you to find out about.

Rosin: And why? Like, what’s the purpose of that? Is the purpose to overwhelm us, the media, simply in order that we will’t sustain—actually, we will’t sustain with it? Like, there simply aren’t sufficient arms?

Parker: Sure.

Scherer: Yeah, I feel it—I imply, it’s to overwhelm us but in addition to overwhelm the American folks, proper? When you keep in mind, the primary weeks of 2017 have been the weeks of the Girls’s Marches, of mass occasions on the Mall, of shock over the Muslim ban. There was a linear high quality to that that allowed for an rebellion, for a resistance—a preferred resistance—to occur, for Democrats to form of work out what their message was.

That hasn’t occurred this time. There’ve been sporadic protests. It’s onerous to maintain observe of all of the court docket instances any given day: , the immigration stuff, the DOGE stuff, , all of the dismantling of federal companies. Look—we’re dwelling in a time the place years are taking place in weeks, proper, by way of, , like, the conventional lifespan of presidency information. And if his aim is a form of radical transformation of how the federal government features, of how American politics works, that’s to his benefit.

Rosin: Michael, in your cellphone name, you requested him about deportations. Let’s take heed to that change.

Rosin: Okay, in order that’s probably not a solution. Did he ever reply this query in your couple of interviews?

Scherer: A pair issues to say. That reply is in keeping with what he has achieved, which is to principally say—it’s, like, the I simply work right here protection. Whenever you level out particular authorized instances, weird arguments his authorities is making, particular errors his authorities has made, particular hurt that has occurred—he instantly distanced himself from that. “I’ve many layers of individuals.” I’m not doing that. Different persons are doing that. We did, in our interview on the Oval Workplace, return into this line of questioning.

Parker: Yeah, after we requested once more, What for those who mistakenly deport an American citizen or the incorrect individual with out due course of? his reply was form of a Gallic shrug of, Effectively, let me let you know: Nothing in life is ideal, which is definitely an argument for due course of, as a result of nothing in life is ideal.

Rosin: Proper.

Scherer: And going again to the 2016 marketing campaign, he has been constant on this. Whenever you carry up actual hurt his insurance policies do or have the potential to do, moderately than defend towards that, he’ll usually say, Effectively, you must examine it to all the opposite hurt that’s being achieved on the earth. And so he’s capable of form of dismiss these issues and summary them. And, , in speaking about immigration and these court docket instances, he usually goes again to the concept, Effectively, hundreds of thousands of individuals got here to america beneath Biden earlier than, they usually weren’t getting detailed hearings as they got here within the authorities. That was a incorrect. So if we’re kicking them out they usually’re not getting detailed hearings going out, why is that so dangerous?

Parker: Proper. He says fairly explicitly, his concept: When you got here right here illegally, you’re basically not entitled to something, proper? That unique sin provides me grounds to form of—he doesn’t put it this explicitly, however—to deal with you all nonetheless I select.

Scherer: And we must always say there that the Supreme Court docket appears to disagree with him. I imply, within the case that’s now nonetheless within the courts concerning the Salvadoran man who was deported again to El Salvador, regardless of a court docket order saying he shouldn’t be deported again to El Salvador, the Supreme Court docket has principally dominated that the federal government has to facilitate his return, that court docket orders matter, you can’t simply make errors and say, Oops.

Rosin: Proper. However you requested him in each your interviews concerning the Supreme Court docket, and he stated, I haven’t all the time agreed with a call, however I’ve by no means achieved something however depend on it. So how do you sq. these two issues, that he appears to be defying the Supreme Court docket—everyone talks about that as a constitutional disaster—however he says very clearly, I depend on the Supreme Court docket. I cannot defy the Supreme Court docket?

Scherer: I don’t assume we’re but on the constitutional-crisis level. Now, what he’s doing is: The Supreme Court docket dominated, despatched it again to the decrease court docket. And he’s now preventing within the decrease court docket. And that’s finally going to return to the Supreme Court docket. And the Supreme Court docket nearly actually may have extra particular directions. The Supreme Court docket’s ruling in that case was principally to ask the decrease court docket to offer directions on the best way to resolve this, and now that’s the place the battle is. There might come some extent the place there’s an express, clear order from the Supreme Court docket, and Trump and his authorities does one thing that he says he received’t do, after which we’ll be in that second.

Parker: His sense of the Supreme Court docket nonetheless is that, My justices are there, and on the finish of the day, when push involves shove, they’re going to rule in my favor. I feel when the rubber meets the highway is that if one thing goes to the Supreme Court docket they usually rule definitively towards him, does he nonetheless stand by, You must do what the court docket says?

Scherer: And in that preliminary cellphone interview, he even went as far as—like, as an apart—to speak about how a lot he likes the Democrats on the Supreme Court docket and the way he sees them at occasions and the way he respects them. And it was form of an unrequested second of reward. So I feel he’s positively working the refs there.

Rosin: So what you’re each saying is that we’re simply nonetheless suspended. Like, we don’t know. We don’t have the disaster but. I imply, what number of headlines I’ve learn that say the constitutional disaster is right here, however you’re not saying that.

Scherer: So I feel strictest definition of a constitutional disaster can be defying the Supreme Court docket—the chief department or the legislative department defying the Supreme Court docket. I feel what might be stated, although, is that the courts transfer a lot slower than the chief department. And so we’re in a second of historical past now the place a lot has occurred which will but very properly be discovered to be unlawful, from the dismantling of USAID to orders of the Pentagon about transgender troops.

Like, all types of issues are within the courts proper now, and it might be two, three years earlier than that ever reaches the Supreme Court docket. So you may have—the system itself isn’t superefficient. And so it may very well be that in three years, we glance again on this yr and say, properly, 10 of the issues he was doing have been unconstitutional and unlawful.

Parker: However the clearest definition, I feel would nonetheless be, for example, the Supreme Court docket says, , simply to simplify it, You completely can’t put any extra undocumented immigrants on planes and fly them to El Salvador. After which Trump is form of like, YOLO. We’re doing it anyhow. That’s the disaster.

Rosin: Proper, and we haven’t achieved that. Ashley, you requested Trump concerning the 2028 hats that his group is promoting.

Parker: Sure.

Rosin: Sure. (Laughs.) You rolled your eyes after I requested you that. What was your takeaway about what he’s saying about operating for a 3rd time period?

Parker: Effectively, , that is all the time the query. Michael and I individually had been chasing a tip we had heard that he had requested his lawyer basic and his Division of Justice to look into whether or not or not he might search a 3rd time period, and he stated, No, I haven’t. In order that was one thing we wished to know: Is that this true? However what’s fascinating is, in reporting out that story, you form of hear either side from his advisers, which is that he says this as a troll. He says this as a, , provocation. However, , there’s folks on the skin—Steve Bannon and others—who actually are methods to do that. And by the way in which, additionally, if Trump ever thought it was truly possible, like, yeah, he’d critically contemplate it. And that was form of the reply he then gave us.

So he stated, No, I haven’t, , requested for a authorized opinion on this. And I type of pressed him and stated, Effectively, , you’ve shattered so many norms. This isn’t one other norm you’d wish to shatter? And he form of goes, Huh, properly, that’d be a extremely huge shatter, wouldn’t it? You realize, perhaps I simply actually wish to shatter. However then he pauses and says, However look—it’s not one thing I’m speaking about. It’s not one thing I’ve regarded into. And albeit, I feel it will be fairly onerous to do. So it’s type of a no till and except it turns into a sure.

Rosin: What do you assume Trump wished to perform by inviting you two and Jeff to the Oval Workplace? Why did he wish to sit down with you?

Scherer: From the very starting of this—from the primary cellphone name, from the primary, , proposal we despatched to his workers, the primary conversations we had—this has been, for him, a negotiation, proper? It’s a transaction. What are they making an attempt to do? Might I profit from it? Is it going to harm me? I feel it’s a window into probably the most important truth of Donald Trump, which is that every part he engages in is a transaction, and he’s fairly good in comparison with different politicians, different folks, at determining the place his benefit is after which discovering these benefits. And that’s principally the story of this story.

Parker: I additionally assume he was—once more, he’s form of a man who essentially got here of age within the ’80s, the place journal covers meant one thing. I imply, I feel they nonetheless imply one thing. However I feel he was intrigued by the concept of being on the quilt of The Atlantic, which isn’t the quilt of one other journal. The Atlantic has written some fairly powerful items about him that he remembers. He remembers Jeff Goldberg’s “suckers” and “losers” piece. And I feel that was interesting to him.

Rosin: And what was the orientation in direction of Jeff? Like, what was the vibe between them? What did he appear to need from Jeff?

Scherer: I feel he wished to—

Parker: He wished to allure him and win him over. And it’s fascinating: Folks will say—Jeff might depart that assembly, proper, and say, like, Effectively, which is the actual Trump? Is it the Trump that was form of solicitous and, , making an attempt to ensure I understood the place he was coming from and looking for my opinion and, , type of having a respectful backwards and forwards? Or is it the Trump who at rallies goes after Jeff by title?

Which is the actual Trump? And the reply is: They’re all the actual Trump, as a result of to essentially perceive Donald Trump—Donald Trump is a consummate salesman, consummate promoter, and he’s making an attempt to win the minute, the hour, the day, the individual straight in entrance of him.

So when Jeff, Michael, and I are sitting within the Oval Workplace in entrance of him, the way in which to win us over might be to not berate us after which toss us from the Oval. And when he’s making an attempt to win over his MAGA base or he’s at a rally or he’s on social media, it’s a special crowd. It’s a special medium. And what you do to win over that group is kind of totally different.

Scherer: And the takeaway isn’t that he actually, really is a captivating gentleman, though he is usually a charming gentleman, or that he’s actually a raving madman you see at rallies or, , am antidemocratic authoritarian. It’s that he’s keen to make use of all of these instruments all through his life and that you just simply have to grasp that about him.

Rosin: Ashley, Michael, thanks each a lot for becoming a member of us.

Parker: Thanks.

Scherer: Thanks.

[Music]

Rosin: This episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by Kevin Townsend and Jinae West. It was edited by Claudine Ebeid and engineered by Erica Huang and fact-checked by Sara Krolewski. Claudine Ebeid is the chief producer of Atlantic audio, and Andrea Valdez is our managing editor.

When you like what you hear on Radio Atlantic, you may help our work and the work of all Atlantic journalists if you subscribe to The Atlantic at theatlantic.com/podsub. That’s theatlantic.com/podsub.

I’m Hanna Rosin. Thanks for listening.